Lightroom 2.0 Will Keep You Up All Night

Uhm, if you're me that is.

Here's a photo I made last year with my Canon 5D:

Here's that same photo with some Develop module work in Lightroom:

Here's that same image with some local corrections in Lightroom 2.0 public beta 1:

Now Lightroom users face the same dilemma that film and video colorists do. You have the tools to do whatever you want to the image. And no one but you will tell you if you've gone too far. Does the last image look better than the middle one? Does it look less natural? Do I care?

There Will Be Blood received an Oscar for cinematography, and did not undergo a DI. But No Country for Old Men did have a DI (Michael Hatzer, colorist) and was, it seemed, neck and neck for the honor. Which do you find more beautiful? More natural? More cinematic?

And which of those three criteria matters the least?

Dodge This

I made fun of Apple for releasing a version of Aperture that was a blatant "me too" response to Lightroom's most-admired features. So in fairness I now must point out that Aperture, while still lacking some key image editing features that make Lightroom my choice, has leaped ahead in two key areas:

Available today as a free software update, Aperture 2.1 includes the Apple-developed plug-in, Dodge & Burn, which adds brush-based tools for dodge (lighten), burn (darken), contrast, saturation, sharpen and blur. Over the coming months, third party software developers will deliver image editing plug-ins for localized editing, filters and effects, noise analysis and reduction, fisheye lens correction and more.

Lightroom, your turn for a "me too!"

EDIT: Right on cue! See comment below from a mysterious "John" who may just be John Nack of Adobe.